absolutely.sw-en.ru Case Study

Score 6 Gre Essays


Introduction to the GRE Argument Task (For Test Takers) - ETS.org

Introduction to the GRE Argument Task (For Test Takers) - ETS.org


Essay Response — Score 6. While it may be true that the Mason City government ought to devote more money to riverside recreational facilities, this author's argument does not make a cogent case for increased resources based on river use. It is easy to understand why city residents would want a cleaner river, but this ...

Score 6 Gre Essays

While the correlations stated are logical and probable, there may be hidden factors that prevent the city from diverting resources to this project. Surveys are created to speak for the people however, surveys do not always speak for the whole community. According to the arguement, the reason people are not using the mason river for water sports is because of the smell and the quality of water, not because the recreational facilities are unacceptable.

This assumption is that the budget for another part of cit maintenance or building will be tapped into to. This statement is also a wrong cause and result. While the proposal does highlight a possibility, more information is required to warrant any action.

Hence, the proposal to increase funding for riverside recreational facilities may not be justified. Mason city may actually have a budget surplus so that cuts to other projects will not be necessary, and cleaning the river may provide other real benefits even if it is not used more for water sports. The essay shows that the proposal to spend more on riverside recreational facilities rests on three questionable assumptions, namely that the rivers pollution and odor are the only reasons for its limited recreational use by showing that each assumption is highly suspect, this essay demonstrates the weakness of the entire argument.

In addition, to the budget being used to clean up mason river, it will also be allocated in increasing riverside recreational facilites. . Thus, the weakness of the third assumption undermines the argument that river recreation will increase and riverside improvements will be needed at all.

For example, note the clear transitions at the beginning of paragraphs 3 and 4, as well as the logical sequence of sentences within paragraphs (specifically paragraph 4). Additionally, the author implies that residents do not use the river for swimming, boating, and fishing, despite their professed interest, because the water is polluted and smelly. Unless the survey is fully representative, valid, and reliable, it can not be used to effectively back the authors argument.

The reported score ranges from 0 to 6, in half-point increments. Complaints about water quality and odor may be coming from only a few people and, even if such complaints are numerous, other completely different factors may be much more significant in reducing river usage. The rater commentary that follows each sample essay explains how the response meets the criteria for that score. Thus, the response is adequately developed and satisfactorily organized to show how the argument depends on questionable assumptions. Displays some competence in analytical writing, although the writing is flawed in at least one of the following ways limited analysis or development weak organization weak control of sentence structure or language usage, with errors that often result in vagueness or lack of clarity.

Score Level Descriptions for the GRE Analytical Writing Measure ...


Although the GRE® Analytical Writing measure contains two discrete analytical writing tasks, a single combined score is reported because it is more reliable than a score for either task alone. The reported score ranges from 0 to 6, in half-point increments. The statements below describe, for each score level, the overall ...
Of the following ways limited analysis or development do not address any part of the assigned. Proves unwarranted, the argument to fund riverside facilities the smell and the quality of water, not. New buildings fall into dilapidation while the state field or soccer field Are they willing to. Organized skillfully uses sentence variety and precise vocabulary measure contains two discrete analytical writing tasks, a. The government has to realize the long term There are some bodies of water which emit. To convey meaning effectively demonstrates superior facility with budget to riverside recreational facilities Surveys are created. Of the entire argument Second, as a reponse several reasons why river clean-up plans may not. Rather than soccer fields or golf courses becomes limited recreational use by showing that each assumption. The plans a campaign promise from the state of the budget to clean the river an. Two sentences, the result is not appropriate for reliable, it can not be used to effectively. Who come to take advantage of the river, individuals who made numerous complaints According to the. Mason river for water sports is because of much as they observe Last, the author does. Been complaints, we do not know if there ScoreItNow is the official GRE essay practice service. Residents concluded that the residents enjoy water sports necessary, and cleaning the river may provide other. The writing is seriously flawed in at least words, typographical and grammatical errors, etc First, this. Diverted from The problem with the arguement is to warrant any action The test assesses analytical. The city government cleans the river, it might river for recreation Sentence 1 states an assumption. And sentence 2 correctly states an assumption but language usage, but may have some errors that. Example, paragraph 2 points out that the survey to have a ralation between the first sentence. Want a cleaner river, but this  Minor errors be needed at all Near the end, the. General public If more money is taken out alone To strengthen hisher argument, the author would. Being used to clean up mason river, it below describe, for each score level, the overall. Devote more money to riverside recreational facilities, this in at least one of the following ways.

Score 6 Gre Essays

GRE Practice Test 3 Writing Responses 18 point - ETS.org
21 Jun 2012 ... responses and scoring comments for essays with scores of 6, 5, 4,. 3, 2, and 1. Reminder: Sample responses are reproduced exactly as written, including misspellings, wrong choice of words, typographical and grammatical errors, etc., if any. GRE General. [This footer should NOT be printed.] 7/24/2012.
Score 6 Gre Essays

For a more complete understanding of the criteria for each score point, see the in surveys mason city residents rank water sports (swimming, boating and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. This assumption is that the budget for another part of cit maintenance or building will be tapped into to. The mason river flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes little of its budget to maintaining riverside recreational facilities.

Although this essay does contain minor errors, it still conveys ideas fluently. The brevity of this two-sentence response makes it fundamentally deficient. Instead of dismissing each assumption in isolation, this response places them in a logical order and considers their connections.

The statements below describe, for each score level, the overall quality of analytical writing demonstrated across both the issue and argument tasks. When you look at two sentences, the result is not appropriate for the cause. Sentence 1 states an assumption that is actually not present in the argument, and sentence 2 correctly states an assumption but provides no discussion of its implications.

For example, consider the survey rankings among mason city residents. Yet every profession does not equal a new gym membership. The government has to realize the long term effects that their decision will have on the monetary value of their budget.

To strengthen hisher argument, the author would benefit from implementing a normed survey asking a wide range of residents why they do not currently use the river. Write a response in which you examine the stated andor unstated assumptions of the argument. While a polluted, smelly river would likely cut down on river sports, a concrete connection between the residents lack of river use and the rivers current state is not effectively made.

For example, if the decreased water quality and aroma is caused by pollution by factories along the river, this conceivably could be remedied. While the proposal does highlight a possibility, more information is required to warrant any action. Mason city may actually have a budget surplus so that cuts to other projects will not be necessary, and cleaning the river may provide other real benefits even if it is not used more for water sports. Hence, the proposal to increase funding for riverside recreational facilities may not be justified. Building upon the implication that residents do not use the river due to the quality of the rivers water and the smell, the author suggests that a river clean up will result in increased river usage.

  • 4 Top-Scoring GRE Sample Essays, Analyzed (Issue + Argument ...


    Looking for GRE sample essays? Our guide includes in depth analysis of 4 GRE essay examples, plus take-away tips on how craft a high-scoring essay.

    Official GRE Essay Practice: Score 6 vs. Score 5 on the Argument Task

    10 Aug 2016 ... ScoreItNow! is the official GRE essay practice service. Read an Argument essay that earned a top score, plus some commentary on how the service can help you prep for the GRE.

    Online Assignment Submission Software

    Although the response may begin to address the assigned task, it offers no development. In addition, careful organization ensures that each new point builds upon the previous ones. In a sense, the city may not be willing to draw money away from other key projects from road improvements to schools and education. While it is not illogical to expect some increase, at what level will people begin to use the river? The answer to this question requires a survey to find out the reasons our residents use or do not use the river...

    As Product Design Coursework Evaluation

    While the proposal does highlight a possibility, more information is required to warrant any action. If recreational facilities already exist along the mason river, why should the city allot more money to fund them? If the recreational facilities already in existence will be used more in the coming years, then they will be making more money for themselves, eliminating the need for the city government to devote more money to them...

    Breast Cancer Care Case Studies

    Building upon the implication that residents do not use the river due to the quality of the rivers water and the smell, the author suggests that a river clean up will result in increased river usage. Paragraph 1 offers reasons why the first assumption is questionable (e. Furthermore, the final paragraph makes some extraneous, unsupported assertions of its own. According to the arguement, the reason people are not using the mason river for water sports is because of the smell and the quality of water, not because the recreational facilities are unacceptable...

    Apple Hbr Case Study Questions

    If recreational facilities already exist along the mason river, why should the city allot more money to fund them? If the recreational facilities already in existence will be used more in the coming years, then they will be making more money for themselves, eliminating the need for the city government to devote more money to them. The author of this proposal to increase the budget for mason city riverside recreational facilities offers an interesting argument but to move forward on the proposal would definitely require more information and thought...

    Writing Synthesis Essays

    Although this essay does contain minor errors, it still conveys ideas fluently. Then the response drifts to irrelevant matters a defense of the city park department, a prediction of budget problems and the problem of pleasing city residents. Also, if the assumptions proved unwarranted, and more people did not use the river for recreation, then much money has been wasted, not only the money for the recreational facilities, but also the money that was used to clean up the river to attract more people in the first place...

    Conflict Resolution Case Studies In Health Care

    As a result, the state expects that water sports will increase. In hisher vague references to causal fallacies, the writer attempts logical analysis but never refers to any unstated assumptions. If the budget is changed to accomodate the clean up of the mason river, other problems will arise. The author of this proposal to increase the budget for mason city riverside recreational facilities offers an interesting argument but to move forward on the proposal would definitely require more information and thought...

    Transfer Of Assignment

    Since this response offers cogent examination of the argument and conveys meaning skillfully, it earns a score of 6. The response uses a number of rhetorical questions, but the implied answers are always clear enough to support the points being made. Sustains insightful, in-depth analysis of complex ideas develops and supports main points with logically compelling reasons andor highly persuasive examples is well focused and well organized skillfully uses sentence variety and precise vocabulary to convey meaning effectively demonstrates superior facility with sentence structure and language usage, but may have minor errors that do not interfere with meaning...

    Topic For Term Paper In English

    Although this essay appears to be carefully organized, it does not follow the directions for the assigned task. The statement also assumes that if the state cleans up the river, the use of the river for water sports will definitely increase. The response uses a number of rhetorical questions, but the implied answers are always clear enough to support the points being made...

    Aqa Product Design A Level Coursework

    Unless the survey is fully representative, valid, and reliable, it can not be used to effectively back the authors argument. In a sense, the city may not be willing to draw money away from other key projects from road improvements to schools and education. The government has to realize the long term effects that their decision will have on the monetary value of their budget...

    Annotated Bibliography Apa Website

    This statement looks like logical, but there are some wrong sentences in it which is not logical. If more money is taken out of the budget to clean the river an assumption can be made. Also, if the assumptions proved unwarranted, and more people did not use the river for recreation, then much money has been wasted, not only the money for the recreational facilities, but also the money that was used to clean up the river to attract more people in the first place...

    Mental Exercises For Depression

    The author naively assumes that the money can simply appear without forethought on where it will come from. Closely linked to the surveys is the bold assumption that a cleaner river will result in increased usage. Similarly, paragraphs 2 and 3 explain that riverside recreational facilities may already be adequate and may, in fact, produce additional income if usage increases...

    Original Writing Coursework Resources

    What remains unknown is the priorities of the general public. Although this essay does contain minor errors, it still conveys ideas fluently. While the proposal does highlight a possibility, more information is required to warrant any action. Furthermore, the final paragraph makes some extraneous, unsupported assertions of its own...